LVMH Facing a Strategic Vacuum: What Next for the Watch Division After Frédéric Arnault's Departure?
<img width="1024" height="683" src="https://ostermanwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/LVMH-watches-and-jewelry-brands-1024x683.jpg" alt="" srcset="
[FRENCH] VERSION
[ENGLISH] VERSION
Frédéric Arnault's departure from the helm of LVMH's watch division marks a decisive milestone in the group's recent history. For several years, he embodied far more than an operational executive: he was the central figure of an ambitious revival in a sector where LVMH, despite its global weight in luxury, has never held a dominant position. His approach, blending technological modernity, masterfully executed digital marketing, and bold product repositioning, redefined the contours of brands like TAG Heuer. Now, an era is drawing to a close, and a crucial question arises: what strategy should the group adopt to maintain, or even accelerate, the momentum already underway?
Frédéric Arnault did not transform LVMH's watch division into a sector giant comparable to the Swatch Group or Richemont, but he did lay solid foundations. Under his leadership, TAG Heuer shifted from being perceived as an aging brand to a highly desirable player, capable of once again competing with the big names in sports and lifestyle watchmaking. Hublot, for its part, maintained its disruptive positioning, while Zenith returned to the spotlight thanks to a masterfully executed product refocus.
Yet despite these advances, the division remained fragmented, with strong but poorly harmonized identities. LVMH's strength in other sectors lies in its ability to structure its brands around a cohesive ecosystem. This unifying thread was still missing in watchmaking. This is perhaps where the opportunity lies, but also the risk.
Scenario 1: Strategic centralization, or a return to group logic
Frédéric Arnault's departure could offer the group an opportunity to refocus watchmaking management around a more institutional structure. By attaching this entity directly to LVMH's executive committee, or to a central figure like Toni Belloni, the group could gain clarity and strategic coherence. This would mean treating watchmaking as an entity to be managed primarily through financial and structural logic, much like fashion or wines and spirits.
This approach would have the advantage of strengthening internal synergies, particularly across transversal functions (R&D, supply chain, retail, digital). However, it would carry a major risk: causing the watch division to slip back into managerial inertia, breaking the entrepreneurial and visionary momentum that had precisely revitalized the brands.
Scenario 2: Appointing a new visionary captain
LVMH could instead decide to extend the Arnault momentum by entrusting the division to a strong personality, capable of taking up the torch with ambition and clarity. The name of Julien Tornare, recently appointed head of TAG Heuer, naturally circulates in this context. A veteran of Vacheron Constantin, he combines traditional experience with a taste for dynamic repositioning. If his tenure at TAG Heuer becomes a springboard, LVMH could rely on him to consolidate the group's entire watchmaking architecture.
Such a choice would send a clear signal: that of continuity in ambition. It would also accelerate product innovation projects, strategic partnerships (in the automotive, sports, or artistic worlds), and strengthen the group's legitimacy with a younger, more international audience.
Scenario 3: Elevating Bulgari as a central pillar
While TAG Heuer has long been the division's flagship brand, nothing prevents LVMH from shifting its strategy toward high-end watchmaking by betting on Bulgari. The Roman house, historically a jeweler, has made remarkable strides in watchmaking in recent years: the Octo Finissimo collection has been acclaimed for its record-breaking thinness and aesthetic consistency. By injecting more resources, the group could turn Bulgari into a credible response to Cartier, which remains the juggernaut of the watch-and-jewelry segment.
This strategy would require a refocusing of the portfolio with a more segmented positioning: Hublot would remain the brand of boldness, Zenith that of technical tradition, and Bulgari would embody high-value watchmaking luxury. In this logic, TAG Heuer could reposition itself as a more accessible, mainstream brand without losing its coherence.
Scenario 4: A more radical portfolio review
Finally, LVMH could decide to completely rethink its watchmaking strategy. This sector, although prestigious, remains marginal in volume compared to the group's other strategic segments. If performance stagnates in the coming years, a partial divestment, a consolidation of brands, or a merger with another luxury entity cannot be ruled out. This would be a deliberate strategic retreat, focusing resources where LVMH holds an undeniable leadership position: fashion, leather goods, jewelry, and hospitality.
Unlikely in the short term, this scenario cannot be ruled out in the long run, especially if the new leadership fails to maintain course or convince the market.
Frédéric Arnault's departure is not just a simple change of management. It is a strategic turning point that forces LVMH to clarify its watchmaking ambitions. Does it want to continue challenging the Swiss giants? Does it plan to establish its brands as essential benchmarks in the sector, or will it be content to develop them within a framework of measured profitability?
The group has the means to match its ambitions. But it now needs a vision, a direction, and a powerful narrative. This is the ground on which the post-Arnault era will be played out, and perhaps the very future of watchmaking at LVMH.
If you found this article interesting, you can also read our article on Frédéric Arnault: the end of the road for watchmaking?
Osterman Watch is one of the few 100% independent watch media outlets.
No advertising. No data collection. No commercial influence.
Just a raw passion for watchmaking, shared with integrity and freedom.
If you appreciate this approach, you can choose to support it.
Make a donation. Preserve a free voice in watchmaking.